Jul 27
Vaccinations & the H1N1 Virus
2009 at 6:46 pm | posted by Rep. Craig Frank 6 comments
A number of constituents have recently sent me a form style e-mail expressing their concerns related to the H1N1 Virus and their associated displeasure of a potential governmentally “mandated” vaccination. In response to those concerns, a bright attorney in the Office of Legislative Research and General Counsel (OLRGC), Catherine Dupont, has drafted a document to help answer some of the questions expressed in those e-mails. Please, realize the content of this document does not necessarily reflect my positions on this matter. I will continue to take input, from constituents in District 57, regarding this matter as the discussion develops. Thanks to Ms. Dupont and the OLRGC.
Here is the letter:
I received your letter in which you raised concerns that Utah might take steps to force
vaccinations and the quarantine of individuals who refuse vaccinations, in particular a
vaccine for the H1N1 flu. You also urged me to support legislation that would recognize
an individual’s right to refuse medical treatment and undergo voluntary isolation with
support from the state if needed for that voluntary isolation. I want to respond to your
concerns.
• While Utah does require some vaccinations for schools, there is the ability under
Utah law to refuse school immunizations for religious and personal beliefs.
• There are no plans in Utah to require vaccinations for the H1N1 flu.
• If there is ever a public health threat or pandemic disease, Utah law first requires
the state to try and obtain consent from the individual with a choice of either
treatment or self isolation. The state may be able to provide some housing and
food support in certain circumstances.
• If an individual poses a public health threat and refuses both medical treatment
or isolation, the state has to go to court and prove by clear and convincing
evidence (which is a higher standard of evidence than most cases) that the
individual poses a public threat and that no other reasonable alternative exists
taking into account a person’s religious and personal beliefs. The recognition of
religious and personal beliefs was an important part of our state’s legislation and
was negotiated by the Church of Christ Scientist who do not believe in medical
treatment.
I am going to provide more detail regarding the state’s laws in the rest of this letter.
No forced vaccination for pandemic H1N1 or seasonal flu
When an approved vaccination for pandemic H1N1 flu is successfully developed, it will
be made available on a voluntary basis for those who choose to receive it. This has
always been the case for the seasonal flu.
Public health officials are tracking this novel virus. Most people, particularly younger
people, have no immune protection against it. This virus has caused illness similar to
seasonal influenza in most people, but has made some people very ill and caused
deaths. Seasonal influenza is a serious condition also, causing an estimated 36,000
deaths each year in the U.S., or about 200-400 in Utah. Seasonal flu is most serious
for the very young and older people.
This new virus is different; most who have become seriously ill and died have been
children and young or middle age adults. In the past, viruses like this have sometimes
continued to change to cause even more serious illness. In 1918, 1957, and 1968
viruses with these characteristics caused pandemics that took the lives of thousands to
millions of people. We hope that this virus will not change in that way, but are
preparing in case it does.
For those reasons, work is underway to produce a vaccine that can be used to protect
people against this new virus. It is likely that an approved vaccine will be made
available in the late fall or winter. Before the vaccine is made available it will have been
tested as are all vaccines before they are approved for use. Efforts are also underway
to put in place methods to monitor closely those that choose to receive the vaccine to
detect any adverse effects that might be missed during the approval process.
When an approved vaccine is produced in large enough quantities to permit public
distribution, it will be available to as many people as supplies permit and who wish to
receive it. Information explaining the benefits and risks of the vaccine will be released
widely to allow people to make an informed decision. It is possible or even likely that
the vaccine will be recommended for children since they have been heavily affected by
the virus. However, there will be no forced vaccination of any group for pandemic
H1N1 or seasonal flu.
Vaccinations for School Admission
Utah Admin. Code R396-100-3 specifies which immunizations are required for
admission to school, unless an exemption is claimed.
(1) A student born before July 1, 1993 must meet the minimum immunization
requirements of the ACIP prior to school entry for the following antigens:
Diphtheria, Tetanus, Pertussis, Polio, Measles, Mumps, and Rubella.
(2) A student born after July 1, 1993 must meet the minimum immunization
requirements of the ACIP prior to school entry for the following antigens:
Diphtheria, Tetanus, Pertussis, Polio, Measles, Mumps, Rubella, and Hepatitis B.
(3) A student born after July 1, 1993, must also meet the minimum immunization
requirements of the ACIP prior to entry into the seventh grade for the following
antigens: Tetanus, Diphtheria, Pertussis and Varicella.
(4) A student born after July 1, 1996 must meet the minimum immunization
requirements of the ACIP prior to school entry for the following antigens:
Diphtheria, Tetanus, Pertussis, Polio, Measles, Mumps, Rubella, Hepatitis B,
Hepatitis A, and Varicella.
(5) To attend a Utah early childhood program, a student must meet the minimum
immunization requirements of the ACIP for the following antigens: Diphtheria,
Tetanus, Pertussis, Polio, Measles, Mumps, Rubella, Haemophilus Influenza Type
b, Hepatitis A, Hepatitis B, Pneumococcal, and Varicella vaccines prior to school
entry.
Utah Code Ann. 53A-11-302 sets forth the process for claiming a personal or religious
exemption.
Quarantine and Treatment Authority
Used in recent times to respond to persons with active Tuberculosis that refuse to be
treated, Utah Code Ann. 26-6b sets forth the legal requirements to be followed if public
health deems this necessary. Court hearings are required unless the person consents
to the restriction and/or treatment. Public health must prove by clear and convincing
evidence that the person poses a serious threat, that no other reasonable alternative
exists, and after taking into account the person’s personal or religious beliefs, the
proposed action is in the public interest.
For Tuberculosis a person who is infectious and untreated may remain in that condition
for a lifetime. In those rare cases where the person refuses treatment, even though
offered at public expense and housing is provided if needed, the only time compulsory
action is taken is after repeated failures to comply with home quarantine.
For the flu, a person is communicable for a relatively short time. No mandatory
treatment order requiring that a person be vaccinated for the flu would be reasonable,
since staying home and avoiding other persons during any period of communicability is
an appropriate response.
I hope this information is helpful. I believe Utah has tried to accommodate the concerns
of people who do not want to receive vaccinations or immunizations. Please let me
know if you still have concerns regarding Utah’s laws.
6 Responses to “Vaccinations & the H1N1 Virus”
Leave a Reply
You must be logged in to post a comment.

July 27th, 2009 at 11:29 pm
Thanks for publishing this. Glad to know my family and I won’t be targeted when we refuse to get untested, costly vaccinations.
July 28th, 2009 at 7:32 am
I understand what Utah Law now says about being able to claim exemption, and not being forced to participate in a vaccination program. However, what if a REAL pandemic happens, where thousands are dying, and lets say the President passes some kind of law, or enforces a police state as a declaration of emergency, where our rights to chose will not be considered and will be taken away. What can you do, and what can I do to ensure this will not happen and our right to chose will not be taken away???
Also, about the information you claim about all vaccinations being tested thoroughly before they are available to the public, is not necessarily correct. Plus, how do we know what exactly is in the vaccinations, and if they really work. Just blind trust to the government? I don’t think so!
July 29th, 2009 at 9:22 am
Blind trust to the government action is NEVER a good idea. As for federal mandates on federal actions: contact your U.S. House Representative and your Senators and express your concerns.
July 31st, 2009 at 5:31 am
Since Dr. Marie-Paule Kieny (WHO) has stepped out to recommend mandatory vaccines in at least 194 countries, has this changed the rules for UTAH in any way?
As I know it, WHO has not only the power to recommend, but also FORCE whatever actions they deem fit without the approval of the President. Is there any assurance for those who’d like to know they have a choice of not taking the H1N1 Vaccine because:
1. They are not sick with any ailment.
2. Their religious beliefs may be against vaccinations.
3. It’s a personal preference not to be vaccinated.
Your reply will be much appreciated. Thank you!
July 31st, 2009 at 8:17 am
Having lived in Utah and finally escaped to freer lands, I can say this: Utah is full of sheep dressed as people. Anyone in “authority” can tell most Utahns what to do and they’ll do it.
Just look at your brand of “conservative,” people. The sales tax rate where I live now is 2.4% LOWER than what it was there. My property taxes (on larger property with a bigger house) is 26% of what it was there. My state has a SURPLUS every single year and NO state income tax. I don’t have to go to some state-run building of shame to buy alcohol and pay hefty taxes for it.
When the uniforms with the needles come around to inject you people with a mandatory vaccine, you’ll line up happily. All they’ll have to do is tell you it’s “mandatory” and “for the children” and one of the brethren will say it’s OK and you’ll all be willing.
The ones that refuse will be turned in by their neighbors as being “contentious.”
August 18th, 2009 at 8:38 am
Response to Aaron above:
where is it that you live now? would like an option like that.
Thanks