Today the US Supreme Court hears arguments relating to “religious monuments” in a Pleasant Grove City park. Significant? Yes.
This entry was posted
on Wednesday, November 12th, 2008 at 10:51 am and is filed under Politics.
You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed.
You can leave a response, or trackback from your own site.
November 12th, 2008 at 3:03 pm
Good question. Can the government actively promote one religion over another? How about a plaque on the lawn of the Utah County Courthouse stating the “Nicene Creed?” Where will this madness stop?
November 17th, 2008 at 12:29 pm
Obi Wan Liberali – Is protecting a historic monument “promoting?” If that’s the case I don’t think it’s fair for the government to promote the Anasazi petroglyphs if I can carve a massive cross next to them.
November 24th, 2008 at 9:32 am
“Historic monument.” Please. Funny they didn’t pick something from Confuscious, Buddha or Osiris. How about the “Articles of Faith”? Where do you stop?